--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de SolidWorks Simulation Premium? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de SolidWorks Simulation Premium gracias a Capterra Costa Rica. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: SolidWorks Simulation Premium - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Costa Rica 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de simulación](/directory/30607/simulation/software) > [SolidWorks Simulation Premium](/software/124171/solidworks-simulation-premium) # SolidWorks Simulation Premium Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/124171/solidworks-simulation-premium Página: 1 de 4\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/124171/solidworks-simulation-premium?page=2) > Solución de simulación que ayuda a las empresas a evaluar diseños estructurales, cargas dinámicas y materiales compuestos. > > Veredicto: 56 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.4/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa SolidWorks Simulation Premium? Plataforma de simulación local y basada en la nube que permite a empresas de todos los tamaños evaluar diseños estructurales, cargas dinámicas y materiales compuestos. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.4/5** | 56 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.1/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: SolidWorks - **Constitución**: 1993 ## Contexto comercial - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: Trabajador autónomo, 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1 000, 1 001-5 000, 5 001-10 000, 10 000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Estados Unidos ## Funciones - Creación de informes/análisis - Herramientas de presentación - Manipulación directa - Modelado de eventos discretos - Modelado del movimiento - Modelado dinámico - Modelado estocástico - Modelado matemático - Presentación gráfica de datos ## Opciones de asistencia - Chat ## Categoría - [Software de simulación](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/30607/simulation/software) ## Alternativas 1. [SimForm](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/1078103/SimForm) — 4.3/5 (3 reviews) 2. [AnyLogic](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/95940/anylogic) — 4.5/5 (518 reviews) 3. [MATLAB](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/125813/matlab) — 4.6/5 (2090 reviews) 4. [SIMUL8](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/114609/simul8-professional) — 4.6/5 (142 reviews) 5. [FlexSim](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/107009/flexsim) — 4.6/5 (128 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "SolidWorks simulation is quite handy\!" — 5.0/5 > **Tousif** | *2 de diciembre de 2020* | Investigación | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The bets feature of SolidWorks Simulation is that it is very very easy to use. The graphical interface makes it quite easy to understand what tool does what. Additionally the built in help and tutorials are very good to start learning the simulation process. It has all bells and whistles to do regular industrial simulations. You can apply several different loading on a part and get pretty good results with appropriate mesh. > > **Puntos en contra**: The major con of SolidWorks Simulation is that the base software is very resource intensive. Which means even without any simulation running it takes up quite a bit of ram of your PC. As a result, while running simulations with finer mesh a mid-tier PC often runs out of memory. Another con is that SolidWorks Simulation is not so good for research problems. It cannot handle custom element codes for advance simulation techniques such as Phase Field Modeling. > > It is overall good as long as I do not have to do anything too complicated. It is best for undergraduate projects and industrial applications. ----- ### "A solid FEA tool for those that don't run FEA everyday" — 5.0/5 > **Nathan** | *20 de mayo de 2024* | Automoción | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I like that the constraints are easy to set up and modify. The analysis is saved within the model itself, so rerunning and remeshing is simple. > > **Puntos en contra**: Edge connections for deformation or heat transfer is difficult for the mesher. Usually, we have to "work around" this by introducing a more substantial interference within the model. I wish there was a better way to do this "for simulation only" connection. > > A great program that is simple to use to gut-check our designs before sending to the broader analysis team. ----- ### "Basically all simulation tools are garbage in- garbage out unless you fully understood the problem" — 3.0/5 > **Sushil** | *12 de junio de 2017* | Fabricación de productos eléctricos/electrónicos | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It is embedded with CAD so it is relatively easier to use. If you understand the theory of the problem you want to solve : the results that you get from SolidWorks simulation tools are as equivalent to other tools like NASTRAN, ANSYS etc. I am the advanced lead engineer at GE transportation and use this tools for vibration analysis, fatigue analysis and static analysis. I solved the real vibration problem using this tool. I am the expert in the vibration analysis theory so for me using SolidWorks is easier, less time consuming than other software like ANSYS, ABAQUS and NASTRAN. I have used ANSYS and NASTRAN in the past but I like SolidWorks Simulation most because you can easily edit the geometry in SolidWorks. Basically the only weak part of SolidWorks Simulation is mesh optimization , it doesn't have that much as it just use tetrahedral element for solid meshing but you need to be aware that mesh optimization is not only the thing through which you get the results what you want. You need to fully understand the problem and only use the simulation as a solver. For example you need to the literature survey and define the problem and data related to the problem first. > > **Puntos en contra**: I think SolidWorks has less strength in fatigue analysis. It has only the stress life approach and it will calculate the fatigue life based on the entered SN Curve. The other problem is: it has just a 5000 data point limit. You cannot enter more than 5000 data input curve for any analysis . It might be the huge problem. For example, if you have a signal of 5 sec time series and the signal is sampled at 1khz , you cannot enter more than 0.5sec time series that might be the issue for analyst . It would be great if they increase the input data limit and especially if they work more in the contact issue in the linear dynamic analysis. They should introduce bolt connector , no penetration/penetration contact , interference fit contact , sliding contact in the dynamic analysis . These contacts are really creating the inferiority of the software as compared to other tools like ANSYS and ABAQUS. The other thing I don't like about this software is they don't have frequency response function tool. If you want to correlate your experimental data with the simulation tool you need to have a frequency response function as FRF is the first measured quantity from the experiment. Try not to be confuse FRF with harmonic response analysis . FRF is ratio of output to input in frequency domain whereas harmonic analysis in SolidWorks is just the maximum amplitude response at the excitation frequencies range. > > I am using this tool for research purpose as well as solving the daily problems ----- ### "Advantage of using SolidWorks Simulation Premium" — 4.0/5 > **Sakith** | *20 de junio de 2019* | Ingeniería industrial o mecánica | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Real time simulation UserFriendly Stress analysis Vibration analysis > > **Puntos en contra**: This is one of best software that i had during my university studies. I did not have any issues when i using this. > > When i doing my projects this is one of most important software for me. As a mechanical engineering undergraduate i have design many prototypes and i had to analyse those project. This real time simulation is very useful for success my projects. ----- ### "Great analysis tool" — 5.0/5 > **Kevin** | *7 de agosto de 2019* | Aviación y aeroespacial | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: One stop shop for modeling and analysis. Very intuitive and quick to learn. > > **Puntos en contra**: Older versions had limited meshing capability. This has gotten better, but still could be improved. > > We use the simulation add-in to solve problems in designing turbo-machinery. It is an effective tool to solve natural frequency resonance, structural, flow, and thermal problems in our machine designs. ----- Página: 1 de 4\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/124171/solidworks-simulation-premium?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/124171/solidworks-simulation-premium) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Datos estructurados