18 años ayudando a las empresas costarricenses
a elegir el mejor software
Fusion
¿Qué es Fusion?
Si eres terapeuta pediátrico, ya conoces todas las diferencias que hay entre tratar a niños y a adultos. Así que no te conformes con cualquier sistema de EMR (registros médicos electrónicos, por sus siglas en inglés). Elige Fusion, el único EMR diseñado específicamente para terapeutas ocupacionales, fisioterapeutas y fonoaudiólogos pediátricos.
Miles de terapeutas de todo el país confían en el EMR específico para pediatría de Fusion para lograr mayor eficiencia en su trabajo (y en su consulta).
Regístrate para obtener una demo gratis de Fusion hoy mismo y descubrir cómo puedes pasar menos tiempo encargándote de los documentos administrativos y más tiempo tratando a los pacientes.
¿Quién usa Fusion?
Fusion Web Clinic sirve a consultas ambulatorias de fisioterapia, terapia ocupacional y fonoaudiología para pacientes pediátricos en los Estados Unidos.
¿Tienes dudas sobre Fusion?
Compara con una alternativa popular
Fusion
Otras alternativas interesantes a Fusion
Opinones de Fusion
Fusion is easy to look at and learn to use.
Comentarios: It has been easy to learn to use. I like it.
Puntos a favor:
It is user friendly. The interface is easy to navigate and easy on the eyes (unlike an app like NetHealth which is overwhelming to look at).
Contras:
There have been no cons to Fusion that I can see so far.
Alternativas consideradas:
Fusion review
Comentarios: Overall pretty good. The therapists love it!
Puntos a favor:
I LOVE the look of the reports, the ease of documentation, and how Fusion is set up to make documentation quick and easy.
Contras:
It feels really clunky. There are things that should be easy but are not. For example, when we added a location to our offices, we tried to add the location to existing clients who had set appointments in a series. As part of that series, their re-evaluations were pre-scheduled. When we changed the location, it erased the re-evaluations. Things like that should not be happening and make using Fusion really frustrating. We also are very frustrated that Fusion will not allow integration with any other software. We wanted to integrate with TimeTap as part of a larger patient experience and ease-of-scheduling package, but Fusion would not allow the integration. We are considering changing EMRs because of this. I'm sure it's because Fusion wants everyone to pay for those features through them, but it feels like you are keeping your clients handcuffed and intentionally limiting their potential and making things more difficult for them. You need to allow people the freedom to add different APIs that will make work-flow easier, even if it is from outside companies. Your clients will not leave- they will appreciate you more for it. Also, the billing side of Fusion is really difficult. You need to get with a few billers who can offer suggestions on how to make it more user-friendly. I even had a biller that wouldn't work with me because I use Fusion.
Some great feature, others not so much.
Comentarios: There are some aspects like assisted billing that are helpful, but then there are some very basic functions that are missing, limiting the usability of the platform. I think it would be great for a smaller clinic.
Puntos a favor:
Automatic claim generation is very useful and speeds up time between therapy taking place and reimbursement. Also very helpful to be able to email/fax out of the system directly to a provider.
Contras:
It would be useful to be able to print off patient's appointments from their chart without having to generate a report through insights. You also cannot filter out paid and unpaid invoices, which makes printing off invoices extremely cumbersome. Because of this, I have to combine all paid invoices for one patient into one invoice so that I am not sifting through thousands upon thousands of invoices each billing cycle. I still have over 3,500 invoices two years after implementing Fusion and combining paid invoices into one. I have to individually select each invoice that I want to print and have to do them in batches since Fusion cannot generate a download that is that large at one time. I don't believe the Fusion is necessarily the best choice for a clinic of our size (1000 active patients at a given time and 55+ therapists). The suggestion feature doesn't seem to make a difference. It seems like random features/updates get added that aren't really useful at all. There is a fee or charge associated with the updates a lot of the time as well, which can be frustrating. No option for sending a reminder about a past due balance either.
Alternativas consideradas:
Easy to Use, with a few opportunities for improvement
Comentarios: It has been a great first experience with EMR.
Puntos a favor:
I like the simplicity of the system overall. The look is not overwhelming. The ease of documenting, searching claims, setting up new accounts, etc. are all helpful. Please note my critique below is not meant to be negative, but rather opportunity for improvement and just notes on how some components could be cleaned up to better serve the purpose.
Contras:
1. How the goals are set up. There is so much confusion for the goals that have been achieved, but we need them to show up on an updated POC (Progress Note), so we can document that they were achieved, so we cannot archive them. But there is so much confusion with goals that appear before the start date of the new POC and the ones that don't get archived at the end of the POC. There should be a start and end date for every goal. If we are carrying that over to the next POC, that should be an option. Our goals often look disorganized because of the transition with POCs/Progress Notes. 2. That you are unable to make any adjustments to an appointment after it is checked in without having to delete the document. It would be great if there was a way to override, if a claim has not yet been submitted. 3. That you are unable to provide an attachment for a secondary claim. We have to file secondary claims manually, since they require the primary EOB.
Alternativas consideradas:
Mostly satisfied.
Comentarios: Overall, we’ve been satisfied with fusion.
Puntos a favor:
Ease of billing, tracking for auths/scripts/reports, task list, messaging, faxing documents
Contras:
Insights reports are difficult to customize and generate. Resources needs to be in a section accessible to everyone not just admins to add resources. Sign off rules should be more customizable by user (or soaps vs reports). Also once a report is started the appointment can’t be edited. We’d like them to be more separated so we can still generate the report or start it ahead of the appointment time but then still reschedule the appointment if needed. Also, adding fees for texting after we had already come on board with this feature included was frustrating. We’d also like to be able to fax patient files rather than just documents.
