--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de N-central? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de N-central gracias a Capterra Costa Rica. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: N-central - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Costa Rica 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Software de gestión de activos informáticos](/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) > [N-central](/software/13803/n-central) # N-central Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/13803/n-central Página: 1 de 11\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/13803/n-central?page=2) > La plataforma de gestión y supervisión remotas N-able® N-central® ha sido diseñada para facilitar la gestión de redes de TI complejas. > > Veredicto: 253 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.2/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa N-central? Crecientes proveedores de servicios de TI y proveedores de gestión de servicios (MSP) ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.2/5** | 253 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.0/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 3.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 3.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 70% | (7/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: N-able ## Contexto comercial - **Precio inicial**: USD 1,75 - **Modelo de precios**: (Prueba gratis) - **Público objetivo**: 2-10, 11-50, 51-200, 201-500, 501-1 000, 1 001-5 000, 5 001-10 000, 10 000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: inglés - **Países disponibles**: Afganistán, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Arabia Saudita, Argelia, Argentina, Armenia, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Azerbaiyán, Bahamas, Bangladés, Barbados, Baréin, Benín, Bermudas y 177 más ## Funciones - Acceso remoto y monitoreo - Alertas y notificaciones - Alerts/Escalation - Análisis de vulnerabilidades - Control/Acceso remoto - Controles o permisos de acceso - Copia de seguridad y recuperación - Creación de informes para TI - Creación de informes y estadísticas - Creación de informes/análisis - Escaneados automáticos - Gestión de BYOD - Gestión de aplicaciones - Gestión de auditorías - Gestión de capacidades - Gestión de configuración - Gestión de contratos o licencias - Gestión de dispositivos - Gestión de implementación - Gestión de la conformidad - Gestión de parches - Gestión de problemas - Gestión de proveedores - Gestión de recursos informáticos - Gestión de restauraciones - Gestión de tareas - Gestión de tickets de soporte - Gestión de toda la red - Gestión del cambio - Implementación automática de parches - Monitorización y gestión remota - Panel de actividades - Panel de comunicaciones - Para MSPs (Proveedores de servicios gestionados) - Portal de autoservicio - Programación - Programación del mantenimiento - Real-Time Data - Real-Time Monitoring - Real-Time Notifications - Registros de eventos - Remote Update/Installation - Seguimiento de actividades - Seguimiento de activos - Seguimiento de activos de TI - Seguimiento de costes - Seguimiento de la conformidad - Seguimiento del comportamiento - Supervisión - Supervisión de redes … y 18 características más ## Integraciones (en total: 36) - 1Password - Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud - Actifile - AlertOps - Automox - Autotask PSA - Auvik - Barracuda Intronis Backup - BrightGauge - Cisco Meraki - CloudBlue - Computicate PSA - ConnectWise PSA - DNSFilter - DeskDay … y 21 integraciones más ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos - Asistencia telefónica ## Categoría - [Software de gestión de activos informáticos](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Software de gestión de activos informáticos](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/30077/it-asset-management/software) - [Software de gestión de redes](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/30018/network-management/software) - [Herramientas de seguridad de equipos informáticos](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/30907/endpoint-protection/software) - [Software de monitoreo de redes y servidores](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/32713/server-monitoring/software) - [Software para gestión informática](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/10001/it-management/software) ## Alternativas 1. [N-sight RMM](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/163344/n-sight) — 4.3/5 (201 reviews) 2. [IT Glue](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/170401/itglue) — 4.6/5 (342 reviews) 3. [ManageEngine OpManager MSP](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/212602/manageengine-opmanager-msp) — 4.4/5 (75 reviews) 4. [NinjaOne](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/165889/ninjaone) — 4.7/5 (296 reviews) 5. [Atera](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/144309/atera) — 4.5/5 (453 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Best Partner, Product is improving quickly." — 5.0/5 > **Joshua** | *6 de junio de 2025* | Seguridad informática y de redes | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: It's ability to handle 3rd party patches is significant for being a default feature set. They also have built a great first pane of glass experience. > > **Puntos en contra**: N-Central does not have the ability to automate against the system itself. This has required my team to work around some of the constraints instead of building exactly what they need. > > N-Able's partnership is not to be matched. They're a great partner. When they promise a feature they deliver it and they're hard at work building the most scalable traditional RMM product that will exist in the market. ----- ### "Solic performer in the MSP arena; best OOB performance among the competition" — 5.0/5 > **James** | *30 de abril de 2026* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: over the years, i have used a lot of RMM/RAT applications. i honestly like N-Central the best. i have a wide selection of stats and metrics available at a glance and if need more details, there are plenty of tools available for investigation.. you have scripts, file push, system cmd line access. installs are easy via the probe or manually and the Take Control app always connects and its pretty stable. > > **Puntos en contra**: I was surprised by the inadequate reporting features. you would think that if i have all these stats and data that i can see on the page, i should be able to check the columns i need and export to a csv, but no. the canned reports are useless. unless you are willing to access n-central via API, i wouldnt even go to the reports section. its the one part of the product i consider subpar and even useless. > > its been solid. we have never had a massive amount of downtime, but there have been a couple. for the 2 instances were services were affected, n-central did reach out and let us know that they knew and were working on it. they kept us informed and resolved the issue in a timely manner.. which for an MSP is minutes, not hours of god forbid, days. ----- ### "N-Central / N-Able Review" — 3.0/5 > **Christian** | *28 de abril de 2026* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 3.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The alerting system is highly reliable, ensuring that critical issues are flagged immediately without constant noise. Deployment of the agent is generally straightforward across various environments, which saves a significant amount of time during onboarding. Additionally, the patch management engine does a solid job of keeping third-party software and OS versions up to date, providing a dependable baseline for security and system stability across our managed endpoints. > > **Puntos en contra**: 1. General Technical Support The support experience has become increasingly frustrating, often feeling like a hurdle rather than a resource. Response times are inconsistent, and there is a noticeable lack of deep technical expertise during initial contact, leading to prolonged downtimes for critical issues. 2. Adlumin Support Support for the Adlumin integration is particularly poor, often resulting in a "finger-pointing" loop where no one takes responsibility. It is difficult to get a straight answer or a specialist who actually understands the nuances of the integration. 3. Lack of Issue Ownership There is a glaring lack of accountability when it comes to taking ownership of open issues. Tickets frequently sit in limbo or are passed between departments without a primary point of contact ensuring the problem is actually resolved to completion. 4. Difficulty with Escalations The escalation process is opaque and incredibly slow. Even when a ticket is clearly beyond the scope of Tier 1, getting it moved to a senior engineer feels like an uphill battle, causing simple technical roadblocks to turn into multi-day ordeals. 5. Automation Policy Limitations (No PowerShell) The inability to natively use PowerShell within automation policies is a major step backward for modern IT environments. Forcing us to use a restrictive, proprietary builder instead of industry-standard scripting severely limits our ability to automate complex tasks. 6. Search Query Regressions A recent update broke the search functionality so that it no longer auto-updates the query results as you type or change parameters. This small but vital UI regression adds unnecessary clicks and friction to what should be a basic, streamlined workflow. 7. Poor Reporting Features The reporting engine is severely lacking and feels outdated. The formatting is strange and unprofessional, making it difficult to hand these documents directly to clients without extensive manual editing or external tools to make the data digestible. 8. Misplaced AI Focus The aggressive push for AI feels like a distraction from core platform stability. Instead of developing AI to solve "non-issues," the development team needs to prioritize fixing the long-standing bugs and workflow limitations that partners deal with every single day. > > The overall experience with N-able is a study in frustration between a solid, functional core and a deteriorating support and development ecosystem. On a technical level, the platform delivers on its primary promises: the alerting is dependable, and the agent deployment and patch management provide a reliable foundation for basic endpoint maintenance. When the "lights are on," the software does exactly what it needs to do to keep a fleet stable. However, the experience begins to sour as soon as you attempt to scale into advanced automation or require vendor assistance. The restriction against native PowerShell in automation policies is a massive hurdle for any modern, script-heavy MSP workflow, forcing a reliance on clunky, proprietary tools. These technical "paper cuts"—like the regressive search UI and lackluster reporting—are compounded by a support structure that seems to lack accountability and a clear escalation path, especially regarding integrations like Adlumin. Ultimately, using N-able feels like driving a reliable car where the manufacturer has stopped listening to the drivers. While the "engine" (patching and alerts) is strong, the "dashboard" (UI/Reports) is dated, and the "service center" (Support) is unresponsive. The recent pivot toward AI features feels like a missed mark; the platform would be far more valuable if the developers focused on refining existing workflows and fixing long-standing bugs rather than chasing industry buzzwords. It remains a "good enough" tool for basic needs, but it is becoming increasingly difficult to justify for high-level automation and complex support requirements. ----- ### "Reliable and Powerful RMM Platform for MSP Growth" — 5.0/5 > **Sean** | *11 de mayo de 2026* | Seguridad informática y de redes | Valoración de la recomendación: 9.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: N-central provides excellent visibility and centralized management across all client environments. The automation capabilities, device monitoring, patch management, and remote access tools significantly reduce administrative overhead, improve response times, and deliver a strong ROI by saving both time and operational costs. Its flexibility and scalability make it ideal for managing both small and large customer environments, and their customer support team is knowledgeable, responsive, and helpful when resolving issues or optimizing platform performance. > > **Puntos en contra**: The initial setup and learning curve can be challenging, especially for new administrators. Some advanced configurations and policy tuning require deeper product knowledge, and the interface can occasionally feel cluttered when navigating complex environments. > > Overall, my experience with N-central has been very positive. It has become a core platform in our managed services operations, allowing us to streamline endpoint management, automate repetitive tasks, improve patch compliance, and proactively monitor client systems. Its robust feature set and reliable performance have helped us deliver better service and support to our customers. ----- ### "A Solid RMM, with some oversights which hurt what could be a perfect product." — 5.0/5 > **Andrew** | *4 de mayo de 2026* | Tecnología y servicios de la información | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The customization it affords with regard to things like patching and alerting users to needed reboots, alongside the Automations provided from the community are highlights. The Automation Builder is great and easy to use, and the fact that it is based on and allows the integration of custom PowerShell scripts makes it very powerful. > > **Puntos en contra**: The UI needs work and was recently made worse. Our company uses it as a cloud-only fully-probeless deployment, and even things like the home screen refuse to land us where we should be going. The new Asset view is clunky and missing lots of features, and the old Device View doesn't allow for custom or resizable columns. These are the gateways to accessing the tools and viewing, filtering, sorting, and launching tasks needs to be easy, fast, robust, and have icons for easy identification and readability. Some of these things should be obvious oversights and it feels like we are going backward with things like the recent removal of all icons. Whoever came up with that idea needs to be fired. The way patch approval rule engine needs an overhaul and simplification, as they way it is currently designed is obtuse and requires hours with support to understand what it is actually doing on the backend and what will and won't be approved and why. This is in dire need of attention. I am happy to expand on this topic on a phone call if it will improve the product, because I believe in it. PLEASE contact me. > > Love/hate. The power it affords is amazing, and in some places, the technical places, it affords a lot of possibility and is easy to use. On the other hand, fighting with the UI is tiresome, and important things like the rule engine controlling which patches are and aren't approved is obtuse and overrides and rule application order don't make logical sense. I am happy to expand on this topic on a phone call if it will improve the product, because I believe in it. PLEASE contact me. ----- Página: 1 de 11\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/13803/n-central?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/13803/n-central) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | it | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | | sv | | ----- ## Datos estructurados