--- description: ¿Qué piensan los usuarios de Open LMS? Lee las reseñas y opiniones verificadas, descubre sus características y el nivel de usabilidad, consulta los precios y conoce las ventajas y desventajas de Open LMS gracias a Capterra Costa Rica. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/capterra/og_logo-e5a8c001ed0bd1bb922639230fcea71a.png?auto=format%2Cenhance%2Ccompress title: Open LMS - Opiniones, precios y características - Capterra Costa Rica 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Inicio](/) > [Plataformas LMS](/directory/30020/learning-management-system/software) > [Open LMS](/software/207738/open-lms) # Open LMS Canonical: https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/207738/open-lms Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/207738/open-lms?page=2) > Open LMS es uno de los mayores proveedores comerciales de servicios de alojamiento y asistencia para el sistema de código abierto Moodle™. > > Veredicto: 9 usuarios lo han valorado con **4.7/5**. De los mejores valorados en **Probabilidad de recomendación**. ----- ## Vista rápida ### ¿Quién usa Open LMS? Open LMS es adecuado para instituciones de educación infantil, primaria y secundaria, institutos, universidades y organizaciones de todos los sectores y tamaños. Crea una experiencia de aprendizaje personalizada para ayudar a los clientes a satisfacer sus necesidades empresariales únicas. ## Estadísticas y valoraciones rápidas | Métrica | Calificación | Detalles | | **En general** | **4.7/5** | 9 Opiniones | | Facilidad de uso | 4.3/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Asistencia al cliente | 4.9/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Relación calidad-precio | 4.2/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Funciones | 4.4/5 | Basado en las opiniones generales | | Porcentaje de recomendaciones | 90% | (9/10 Probabilidad de recomendación) | ## Sobre el proveedor - **Empresa**: Learning Technologies Group - **Constitución**: 2011 ## Contexto comercial - **Público objetivo**: 51-200, 201-500, 501-1 000, 1 001-5 000, 5 001-10 000, 10 000+ - **Despliegue y plataformas**: Cloud, SaaS, Web, Mac (desktop), Windows (desktop), Linux (desktop), Windows (local), Linux (local), Chromebook (desktop), Android (móvil), iPhone (móvil), iPad (móvil) - **Idiomas admitidos**: español, francés, inglés, japonés, portugués - **Países disponibles**: Albania, Alemania, Andorra, Angola, Anguila, Antigua y Barbuda, Argelia, Argentina, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belice, Benín, Bermudas, Bielorrusia, Bolivia, Bosnia y Herzegovina, Botsuana y 165 más ## Funciones - Aprendizaje asíncrono - Aprendizaje colaborativo - Aprendizaje mixto - Aprendizaje móvil - Aprendizaje sincronizado - Autoría de cursos integrada - Certificación y licencias - Conformidad con SCORM - Gestión de contenidos - Gestión de cursos - Ludificación - Líneas e itinerarios educativos - Portal del alumno - Seguimiento de cursos - Seguimiento del avance - Tests/Evaluaciones ## Integraciones (en total: 13) - Aspire - ChatGPT - Class for Web - Ease - Go1 - Honorlock - IntelliBoard - Kaltura Video Platform - Motrain - OpenSesame - Panopto - SMOWL - Sumadi ## Opciones de asistencia - E-mail/Help Desk - Preguntas frecuentes/foro - Base de conocimientos ## Categoría - [Plataformas LMS](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/30020/learning-management-system/software) ## Categorías relacionadas - [Plataformas LMS](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/30020/learning-management-system/software) - [Herramientas de aprendizaje móvil](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/30954/mobile-learning/software) - [Software de gestión de la formación](https://www.capterra.co.cr/directory/10008/training/software) ## Alternativas 1. [Canvas](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/127214/canvas) — 4.6/5 (4320 reviews) 2. [Moodle](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/80691/moodle) — 4.3/5 (3379 reviews) 3. [Connecteam](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/153140/connecteam) — 4.6/5 (5203 reviews) 4. [Paylocity](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/86714/webpay) — 4.3/5 (1839 reviews) 5. [360Learning](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/211429/360learning) — 4.7/5 (488 reviews) ## Opiniones ### "Interacción de estudiantes e docentes" — 5.0/5 > **Usuario anónimo** | *17 de julio de 2025* | Administración educativa | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Sus opciones de Aprendizaje personalizado, en el tema de integraciones y otros funcionalidades que complementan al moodle nativo. > > **Puntos en contra**: En su inicio el tema de tener una matriz de plugin permitidos, no poder agregar mas temas de sitio, formatos de cursos y otros plugin. > > Muy buena, en mi caso a nivel de administrador de sitio, es una plataforma bien trabajada y que ofrecen cambios constantemente. ----- ### "A solid product only limited by your imagination" — 4.0/5 > **Allison** | *4 de mayo de 2026* | Relaciones gubernamentales | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: The system is used by many institutions so courses are transferable. It is logical to use,not always easy though. Course creation can be done by most computer literate people and compared to other LMS', they have commented that Moodle is practical, interactive, and easier to use. As an administration it is good to have the service support just an email away. > > **Puntos en contra**: The system is large so all features are not fully used and unless you are dedicated Admin manager of your system, many of the Admin features can be difficult to fully understand. The activities do not present as sexy as they do in other platforms. The Community is hard to search and rarely do I find answers. > > I like Moodle, I like the support, I just don't like the fact that my particular site is not aesthetically pleasing and we lack after course interaction, I lack the knowledge and imagination to improve it and I don't know where to find the inspiration. ----- ### "Leave well-enough alone and focus instead on needed improvements" — 4.0/5 > **Kirsten** | *5 de mayo de 2026* | Aprendizaje en línea | Valoración de la recomendación: 8.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: I appreciate --the helpful staff --the fact that it is reliable --it's Moodle --we don't need to worry about it --the site is functional > > **Puntos en contra**: Things we dislike --the theme (and lack of theme choices) --unnecessary changes, especially when other aspects need more attention --the updates often make the system less usable and user-friendly instead of more usable and user-friendly ----- ### "Solid architecture and managed learning, but with severe operational and integration constraints in the long term." — 5.0/5 > **Carlos Guillermo** | *4 de mayo de 2026* | Administración educativa | Valoración de la recomendación: 7.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: Personalized Learning Designer (PLD): The capability to automate workflows via conditional rules is solid. However, it presents operational difficulties during course content restoration processes; when restoring a course into a new target environment, the new course frequently struggles to maintain the optimal functionality and execution of these inherited rules. > > **Puntos en contra**: 1. Closed Architecture and Integration Friction: Being a highly managed and closed environment, there is a severe backend lockout. There is an inability to perform advanced SQL queries, and when utilizing the ad-hoc reporting module, query execution is sluggish and prone to crashing. Furthermore, delayed-execution reports take an excessive amount of time to generate. Additionally, obtaining robust reporting capabilities requires licensing third-party products at exorbitant costs, often rivaling the core Open LMS licensing fees themselves, rather than providing a native advanced reporting system commensurate with its high pricing tier. 2. Rigidity in Plugin Deployment: The process of incorporating plugins is highly cost-inefficient, as clients are forced to pay for the adaptation of any plugin not already included in their proprietary matrix to ensure compatibility with Open LMS. This directly conflicts with the open-source philosophy of Moodle, which boasts over 2,000 free plugins. It is structurally paradoxical to incur development costs to deploy a plugin that is natively free in standard Moodle environments. 3. Asymmetrical Active User Cost Structure: The pricing model based on active users is disproportionately expensive, as clients inevitably pay for the retention of historical data used strictly for reporting purposes. It is fundamentally illogical to incur the same licensing fee for an alumnus whose data has been dormant for a decade as for a highly active, concurrent user interacting with the platform daily. > > My overall experience following an extended customer lifecycle has been a dichotomy between operational excellence and technological restriction. For years, Open LMS functioned as a flawless learning management engine; its open-source-based core, optimized for cloud architecture, eliminates the friction of server administration and delivers uninterrupted availability, fully justifying its deployment in critical institutional environments. Instructional design tools, such as the PLD, are top-tier for facilitating teacher-student interaction. However, a comprehensive long-term evaluation reveals a distinct technical glass ceiling. As institutional requirements evolve toward advanced data science, the integration of external artificial intelligence models, or the imperative for absolute technological sovereignty over database architectures, the 'sandbox' nature of Open LMS becomes a severe operational bottleneck. The bureaucratic friction required to enable specific extensions and the incremental cost model ultimately lead to technological stagnation. It remains an exceptional product for organizations that prioritize total infrastructure delegation, but it is highly restrictive for institutions demanding architectural flexibility, deep process auditing, and contractual independence over their proprietary information ecosystems. ----- ### "A powerful, highly customizable LMS with outstanding support" — 5.0/5 > **Marcelo** | *4 de mayo de 2026* | Aprendizaje en línea | Valoración de la recomendación: 10.0/10 > > **Puntos a favor**: As an administrator, the best thing about Open LMS is its limitless flexibility. Because it is built on Moodle, we are never boxed into a rigid system. If we need a specific feature, there is almost always a plugin, LTI integration, or configuration available to make it happen. The Personalized Learning Designer (PLD) has been a game-changer for us, allowing us to automate administrative tasks, send targeted alerts, and create custom learning paths without needing a developer. Furthermore, the peace of mind that comes with their managed hosting is incredible. We get the deep customizability of an open-source platform, but with the reliability, security, and top-tier customer support of a premium SaaS product. Their support team is responsive, knowledgeable, and truly acts as a partner in our success. > > **Puntos en contra**: Because the platform is so feature-rich and powerful, there is a bit of a learning curve when you first take over the backend administration. Setting up granular role permissions and advanced reports requires some initial time investment to get right. However, this is a minor trade-off for having such a highly customizable system, and the Open LMS support documentation and help desk are always there to guide you through any complex setups. > > My experience has been overwhelmingly positive. Open LMS provides a stable, scalable environment that easily handles our large user base and complex organizational needs. It takes the stress out of server maintenance and upgrades, allowing me as an admin to focus entirely on improving the user experience and building a better learning ecosystem. It is a fantastic platform backed by a great team. ----- Página: 1 de 2\ Siguiente: [Página siguiente](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/207738/open-lms?page=2) ## Enlaces - [Ver en Capterra](https://www.capterra.co.cr/software/207738/open-lms) ## Esta página se encuentra disponible en los siguientes idiomas | Local | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | de-CH | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-IL | | | en-IN | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-AR | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-CR | | | es-DO | | | es-EC | | | es-MX | | | es-PA | | | es-PE | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | fr-LU | | | ja | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | | pt | | | pt-PT | | ----- ## Datos estructurados